Shanghai Jiao Tong University / Shanghai AI Laboratory
Generative medical visual question answering model that pairs a vision encoder with a language model, trained on the 227k-pair PMC-VQA dataset.
MedVInT (Medical Visual Instruction Tuning) is a generative foundation model for medical visual question answering (VQA), introduced in the PMC-VQA paper by Xiaoman Zhang, Chaoyi Wu, Weidi Xie and colleagues at Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Shanghai AI Laboratory in May 2023. The model addresses a central limitation of earlier medical VQA systems, which treated the task as classification over a fixed answer vocabulary. By reframing medical VQA as an open-ended generative problem, MedVInT can produce free-form answers to clinical image questions rather than selecting from a predefined label set.
The model is trained on PMC-VQA, a large-scale dataset the authors built with a scalable generation pipeline drawing on figures and captions from PubMed Central open-access articles. PMC-VQA contains 227k question-answer pairs spanning 149k images across diverse imaging modalities and diseases, making it substantially broader in scope than the small, modality-specific benchmarks that preceded it.
MedVInT sits at the intersection of medical imaging and multimodal language modeling. It pairs a domain-adapted vision encoder with a medical large language model, building on the same group's PMC-CLIP and PMC-LLaMA work, and it established a public leaderboard to standardize evaluation of generative medical VQA systems.
MedVInT connects a pretrained vision encoder to a large language model through a trainable projection module. The vision pathway uses a ResNet-50 from PMC-CLIP, with either a 2-layer MLP or a 12-layer transformer projecting visual features into the language space. The TE (text-encoder) variant builds on encoder language models such as PubMedBERT, LLaMA-ENC, or PMC-LLaMA-ENC, with a 4-layer multimodal transformer decoder trained from scratch and a masked-language-modeling objective. The TD (text-decoder) variant uses decoder-style LLMs (LLaMA-7B or PMC-LLaMA-7B) directly as the multimodal decoder, and is first pretrained on PMC-OA image captioning before VQA fine-tuning. On the PMC-VQA test set, the strongest TD configuration (PMC-CLIP plus PMC-LLaMA) reaches 40.3% accuracy on multiple-choice and 33.6% on open-ended questions. On established benchmarks, MedVInT-TD attains 73.7%/86.8% (open/closed) on VQA-RAD and 84.5%/86.3% on SLAKE.
MedVInT targets clinical and research scenarios where natural-language reasoning over medical images is useful, such as radiology and pathology image interpretation, automated report drafting, medical education, and interactive diagnostic support tools. Because it generates free-form answers across many modalities, it is better suited than fixed-label classifiers to the open-ended, heterogeneous questions that arise in real clinical workflows. The released weights and PMC-VQA dataset also serve as a baseline and training resource for researchers building and benchmarking medical multimodal assistants.
By reframing medical VQA as generation and providing a large, openly licensed dataset and leaderboard, MedVInT and PMC-VQA helped catalyze the wave of medical multimodal language models that followed. PMC-VQA has become a widely used benchmark for evaluating generative medical VQA systems, and the accompanying PMC-CLIP and PMC-LLaMA backbones are frequently reused as biomedical foundation components. The model's main limitation is accuracy: even the best configurations remain well below clinical reliability, underscoring that current generative medical VQA is a research tool rather than a deployable diagnostic system.
Zhang, X., et al. (2023) PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering. arXiv.org.
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.10415Papers that recently cited this model.
Zhuoyuan Fu, Zeshang Li, Yiqiong Zhang, et al.
Jul 2026
Runhan Shi, Quan Zhou, Yuqian Xu, et al.
Jul 2026
Ethan Chung, Chuanjun Zheng, Jasper Tan, et al.
Jul 2026
The most-cited papers that cite this model.
Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, et al.
International Conference on Learning Representations · Oct 2023
Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Yue Cao, et al.
arXiv.org · Dec 2024
Shukang Yin, Chaoyou Fu, Sirui Zhao, et al.
National Science Review · Jun 2023
Shengyu Zhang, Linfeng Dong, Xiaoya Li, et al.
ACM Computing Surveys · Aug 2023
Wenxuan Huang, Bohan Jia, Zijie Zhai, et al.
arXiv.org · Mar 2025
Share of papers citing this model.