The state of biological AI at a glance — which models drive the most academic impact and developer adoption, and how open the field actually is. Across 2336 models, with 2328 carrying a bio.rodeo openness score built from the Model Openness Framework’s 17 release components.
Every published model placed by what it does — models with similar descriptions sit close together, so the clusters are the field's real subfields rather than our category labels.
The biggest and most-cited models — colored by openness score so you can see whether scale and openness go together.
The bio.rodeo openness score rates every assessed model on a 0–100 gradient — split into usability (can I run it?) and reproducibility (can I retrain it?). These views show that gradient, the trend over time, where models fall short, the licenses in play, and how openness relates to impact.
Openness and impact broken down by biological domain and by organization, plus the field's growth in scale over time.