Yeast sequence-to-expression model predicting strand-specific RNA-seq coverage across a 5 kb multi-gene window at 10 bp resolution.
No providers recorded yet. Browse all providers
Yorzoi is a sequence-to-expression model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae that predicts strand-specific RNA-seq coverage directly from DNA sequence. It was developed at Imperial College London with the University of British Columbia and posted as a preprint in September 2025. The motivating problem is practical: budding yeast is the standard chassis for testing heterologous DNA, but there is no cheap way to know whether a multi-gene construct will be transcribed as designed before it is built.
Existing yeast regulatory models mostly operate on a single gene and return one scalar per sequence, which cannot capture the failure modes that matter in real constructs — readthrough past a weak terminator occluding a downstream promoter, converging promoters colliding, or a bidirectional promoter driving antisense transcription. These reshape the coverage profile without necessarily changing a per-sequence readout such as fluorescence or TPM. Yorzoi instead predicts a positionally and strand-resolved profile over a 4,992 bp window spanning one to three genes, at 10 bp resolution.
The model adapts the architecture of Borzoi, the human and mouse RNA-seq coverage model, to a genome roughly 500 times smaller, shrinking the input window from Borzoi's 524 kb so that tiling the yeast genome still yields enough training samples. It arrives alongside Shorkie, a contemporaneous yeast sequence-to-expression model built on cross-species self-supervised pretraining; Yorzoi's distinguishing move is to broaden its training data beyond native sequence space rather than beyond a single species.
Yorzoi's architecture derives from Flashzoi, a PyTorch reimplementation of Borzoi using FlashAttention-2 and rotary positional embeddings. Convolutional layers downsample the one-hot sequence while widening channels, eight transformer blocks attend over the resulting 156-position representation at 32 bp resolution, upsampling layers with skip connections restore resolution, and a head emits per-track coverage. Removing downsampling layers relative to Borzoi yields a compact 19.3M-parameter model. Training used a shape-and-magnitude decomposed objective — multinomial negative log-likelihood plus 0.1× Poisson negative log-likelihood — over 250 epochs at batch size 30 on a single NVIDIA RTX A6000, taking about 1.5 hours.
Training data comprises about 21 Mb of sequence paired with coverage: 12 Mb from the native genome and its SCRaMbLE rearrangements, profiled by 71 direct Nanopore RNA-seq runs, and 9 Mb of human DNA in YACs, profiled by 10 new stranded Illumina experiments, tiled into roughly 16,000 samples. On held-out windows Yorzoi reaches a median per-sequence Pearson R of 0.69, with Nanopore-derived tracks predicted better (mean R = 0.73) than Illumina tracks (0.61). Magnitude error, as log2 fold change of summed counts, has σ = 1 for native yeast sequence and σ = 0.8 for human sequence.
The model targets design-stage screening in yeast synthetic biology. The authors demonstrate three uses: comparing gene orders and orientations in a five-gene violacein pathway, where placing vioD divergently from vioA depresses its predicted coverage; benchmarking four codon optimizers, which substitute up to 60% of codons synonymously and are predicted to swing transcript levels roughly 15-fold; and driving the Ledidi editing framework to propose non-coding edits that double predicted GFP transcript levels. Inference runs through a web app and an HTTP API, so wet-lab groups without GPUs or ML expertise can prioritize constructs before committing to synthesis.
Yorzoi is the first model to predict RNA-seq coverage profiles from sequence for S. cerevisiae at near-base-pair resolution across multiple genes, and its corpus of human DNA expressed in yeast is a novel source of non-native regulatory signal. The authors are candid about where it falls short: predicting how SCRaMbLE rearrangements change expression reaches only Pearson R = 0.33 and 0.62 balanced accuracy on the direction of change, and an ablation found that adding human DNA improved coverage prediction on human inserts without consistently improving downstream MPRA or novel-junction performance. The work remains a preprint awaiting peer review, and the training data covers a single growth condition, so conditional or inducible promoter behavior is outside its current scope.
Much of this page is generated or calculated automatically. Flag anything that looks off and we will re-run it.