Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School / Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
Generalist MRI vision-language foundation model that handles reconstruction, segmentation, abnormality detection, and report generation in one model.
OmniMRI is a vision-language foundation model that aims to cover the entire magnetic resonance imaging workflow — reconstruction, segmentation, abnormality detection, diagnostic reasoning, and report writing — inside a single architecture. It was developed by the Intelligent Imaging Innovation and Translation Lab, based in the Department of Radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Harvard Medical School, with a collaborator from Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma.
The problem it addresses is structural rather than algorithmic. Deep learning has produced strong MRI models for individual steps, but each is typically bound to one anatomy, one contrast, or one task, so a working clinical pipeline becomes a chain of separately trained, separately validated systems that cannot share representations. Existing generalist medical segmentation models such as MedSAM and VISTA3D unify segmentation across anatomies but stop short of the language side of radiology — the findings, impressions, and recommendations that constitute the actual clinical product.
OmniMRI's answer is to treat every step as an instruction-following problem over a shared token stream of image and text. The same checkpoint reconstructs an undersampled brain acquisition, segments knee cartilage, localizes a lesion with a bounding box, or drafts a structured report, depending only on the prompt it receives.
Images are tokenized by a Swin Transformer vision encoder that captures hierarchical features across resolutions; text is tokenized by a lightweight encoder initialized from Qwen2.5. Both streams feed a unified autoregressive Transformer backbone, also adapted from Qwen2.5, that applies multimodal self-attention over the joint sequence and uses a mixture-of-experts feedforward network to increase capacity without proportional compute. Training proceeds in four stages: self-supervised vision pretraining combining masked image modeling with a patch-level contrastive objective; vision-language alignment against a frozen vision encoder; unified multimodal pretraining; and multi-task instruction tuning.
The training corpus was curated and harmonized from 60 public datasets, totaling 47,917 patients, 70,580 scans, 224,194 volumes, and over 19 million slices. Task annotations are dominated by segmentation (53.6%) and diagnosis (19.6%), followed by reconstruction (17.9%), detection (5.4%), and report generation (3.6%). Reported results are qualitative demonstrations across the five task families — including reconstruction of 6× accelerated brain acquisitions — and the authors identify large-scale quantitative benchmarking and radiologist reader studies as work still to be done. Parameter counts are not disclosed.
The intended use is consolidation: replacing a chain of narrow MRI tools with one model that a radiology department can prompt for accelerated reconstruction, organ and lesion segmentation, triage of suspicious findings, and first-draft reports. For imaging researchers, a single backbone pretrained across anatomies and contrasts offers a starting point for new MRI tasks without assembling an anatomy-specific pretraining corpus, and the instruction interface makes it straightforward to add tasks by adding prompts rather than architecture.
OmniMRI is an argument that the fragmentation of MRI pipelines is a modeling choice rather than a necessity, and it backs that argument with one of the largest curated multi-anatomy MRI corpora assembled from public sources. Its practical status is more limited than its scope suggests: the preprint reports qualitative examples rather than benchmark numbers, no comparison against task-specific state of the art is provided, and the public repository carries a BSD-2-Clause license and documentation but no code or pretrained weights. Independent evaluation therefore depends on a future release, and the work has not yet been peer reviewed.
Papers that recently cited this model.
The most-cited papers that cite this model.
Providers that host OmniMRI for inference, fine-tuning, or weight download.
No providers recorded yet. Browse all providers
Not enough data