Sparse-view CBCT reconstruction foundation model pretrained on 8,407 CT volumes, recovering full 3D anatomy from as few as six X-ray projections.
No providers recorded yet. Browse all providers
Cone-beam computed tomography is the workhorse 3D imaging modality of dentistry, orthopedics, and image-guided radiotherapy, but a standard scan fires hundreds of X-ray projections at the patient. Sparse-view reconstruction cuts that dose by an order of magnitude — six to ten projections instead — and relies on a model to recover the missing structure. The catch has been generalization: methods that optimize a neural field per scan are slow, and supervised networks trained on one anatomy and scanner geometry degrade badly when moved to another. Every new site has effectively meant a new model and a new dataset.
DeepSparse, from the xmed-lab group led by Xiaomeng Li at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology with a collaborator at Sichuan University, is presented as the first foundation model for sparse-view CBCT reconstruction. It transplants the pretrain-once, adapt-cheaply pattern into tomographic reconstruction: a single backbone is pretrained on thousands of CT volumes covering the body from head to knee, then fine-tuned in two short steps onto a target anatomy and scanner geometry using a small number of labeled scans. The paper was accepted to IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging in 2026.
Two components carry the result. DiCE (Dual-Dimensional Cross-Scale Embedding) is the reconstruction network, fusing multi-view 2D features from the projections with multi-scale 3D features back-projected into the volume. HyViP (Hybrid View Sampling Pretraining) randomizes the number of input views during pretraining, so the backbone is not locked to one acquisition protocol.
DiCE pairs a 2D encoder that extracts multi-scale features from the input projections with a 3D decoder that produces a low-resolution volumetric representation from back-projected features, plus a point decoder that predicts attenuation coefficients at arbitrary coordinates — an implicit neural representation, which is why reconstruction resolution is not fixed by the architecture. The published configuration uses four feature scales and a volumetric resolution of 32. Pretraining ran on AbdomenAtlas-8K: 5,195 CT scans cropped along the axial direction into 8,407 sub-volumes, resampled to 256³ at 1.5 mm isotropic spacing, with digitally reconstructed radiographs generated under a standard cone-beam geometry.
Fine-tuning and evaluation covered five target datasets across four anatomies — LUNA16 (888 chest CT), ToothFairy (443 head CBCT), PANORAMA (2,044 abdominal CT), PENGWIN (100 pelvic CT), and a 614-scan knee CBCT set. At six views on LUNA16, DeepSparse reaches 30.22 dB PSNR and 89.96 SSIM against 29.23 dB and 87.47 for C²RV, the prior best. Gains run 1–2 dB PSNR on head, chest, and abdomen and 3–4 dB on pelvis and knee. The value of pretraining shows most clearly under data scarcity: with only 73 training scans, 10% of LUNA16, the pretrained model holds 28.35 dB versus 27.13 dB for the same architecture trained from scratch.
The direct beneficiary is any imaging workflow where dose matters and scan volume is high — pediatric and dental CBCT, intraoperative and interventional imaging, and daily cone-beam positioning scans in radiotherapy, where patients are imaged repeatedly over a treatment course. Because adaptation needs only a two-step fine-tune on a modest labeled set, a department can bring the model onto its own scanner geometry without assembling a large in-house corpus — the usual obstacle for deep reconstruction methods outside well-resourced centers.
DeepSparse extends the foundation-model framing from medical image interpretation, where it is now routine, into image formation, where per-dataset training from scratch had remained the norm. Code for pretraining, fine-tuning, and evaluation is released under an MIT license, and both pretrained and fine-tuned checkpoints are published on Hugging Face, making it directly reusable rather than a paper-only result. The evaluation is entirely retrospective and simulation-based: projections are digitally reconstructed from CT volumes rather than acquired on a physical cone-beam scanner, so real-world scatter, motion, and detector noise remain untested, and no reader study or clinical validation has been reported.
Much of this page is generated or calculated automatically. Flag anything that looks off and we will re-run it.