Bacterial protein-compound binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence and SMILES, evaluated zero-shot on two species held out of training.
No providers recorded yet. Browse all providers
Most compound-protein interaction models were built for human targets. Bacterial proteomes differ enough in post-translational chemistry and sequence composition that repurposing those models for anti-infective discovery is unreliable, and the shortfall matters: two-thirds of the antibiotics in clinical use were developed between the 1940s and the 1960s, while resistance in the ESKAPEE pathogens keeps narrowing the options that remain.
BaCNet — Bacterial Compound-protein interaction Network — is a binding-affinity predictor trained specifically on bacterial targets. Developed by Yuki Otani, Daisuke Koga, Yasunari Wakizaka, and Hideyuki Shimizu at the Institute of Science Tokyo and posted as a preprint in March 2025, it takes a protein's amino acid sequence and a compound's SMILES string and returns a single scalar, the "BaCNet score," with no structure, docking, or assay data required at inference.
Its distinguishing design choice is the evaluation protocol. Two entire species — the Escherichia coli K-12 strain and Pseudomonas aeruginosa — were removed from the training corpus and reserved as an external test set, simulating the arrival of a pathogen the model has never met. Because no other Pseudomonas species appear in training, P. aeruginosa is novel at the genus level. A single trained checkpoint is applied to both without retraining, and the same fixed scorer drives all downstream screening.
Training used roughly 16 million compound-protein interaction records drawn from STITCH v5.0 for 23 ESKAPEE-associated bacterial species, with STITCH combined scores Box-Cox transformed and normalized to [0, 1]. After removing the two external-test species, the remainder was split 80/10/10 with no protein sequence shared across partitions. Proteins are embedded with a frozen ESM-2 15-billion-parameter model (esm2_t48_15B_UR50D), column-averaged to a 5,120-dimensional vector. Compounds are embedded as a 1,024-bit Morgan fingerprint, a 1,280-dimensional Chemical Checker signature, and a 384-dimensional ChemBERTa-2 embedding, concatenated to 2,688 dimensions. The resulting 7,808-dimensional vector feeds a three-layer perceptron of widths 1,024, 256, and 32 with ReLU and batch normalization, trained with MSE loss and AdamW on eight A100 GPUs. On the held-out test set the model reached a Pearson correlation of 0.9382 (95% CI 0.9378-0.9387), a Spearman correlation of 0.9325, MSE 0.00975, and MAE 0.0577.
Applied to penicillin-binding proteins, BaCNet ranked 2,616 DrugBank compounds against E. coli K-12 PBP and 186,036 filtered natural products from COCONUT against P. aeruginosa PBP. Molecular dynamics on the top 300 COCONUT hits found one compound binding the transpeptidase pocket at -9.14 kcal/mol without a beta-lactam ring. Three rounds of Optimization Flow produced a generated compound scoring above every molecule in the source library.
BaCNet targets the screening stage of antibacterial discovery, where the practical bottleneck is deciding which of hundreds of thousands of compounds justify synthesis and assay. Because it needs only a sequence, it fits outbreak scenarios in which a newly sequenced pathogen has no solved structures and no assay history: a candidate target can be scored against a repurposing library the same day. The non-beta-lactam PBP binders it surfaced are of particular interest to groups working on beta-lactamase-resistant infections, and the Optimization Flow loop extends the same scorer into lead optimization.
BaCNet is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed; no code or model weights have been released, and the preprint carries no data or code availability statement, so independent reproduction is not currently possible. Its evaluation is entirely computational — the compound predictions were assessed by molecular dynamics rather than by microbiological assay — and the authors are explicit that the score reflects predicted binding, not measured inhibition, since the model encodes no three-dimensional structure and no pharmacokinetic or toxicity information. What it does establish is that a protein language model trained on all of life transfers usefully to bacterial targets, and that a fixed compound-protein scorer can hold accuracy on a genus it has never seen — the property that any screening tool for emerging pathogens has to demonstrate.
Much of this page is generated or calculated automatically. Flag anything that looks off and we will re-run it.