Mahmood Lab / Brigham and Women's Hospital
Attention-based multiple instance learning slide classifiers from the Mahmood Lab, pretrained on a 108-way pan-cancer task over 24,000 slides for transferable whole-slide pathology analysis.
ABMIL (Attention-Based Multiple Instance Learning) is a slide-level aggregation method that pools a whole-slide image's patch features into a single prediction using a learned attention mechanism, originally introduced by Ilse, Tomczak, and Welling at ICML 2018. In computational pathology it has become a standard downstream head: a patch encoder first turns a gigapixel slide into a bag of embeddings, and an ABMIL model weights and combines those embeddings for tasks such as cancer subtyping or biomarker prediction. This entry documents a specific set of pretrained ABMIL checkpoints released by the Mahmood Lab at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital.
What distinguishes these checkpoints is not the architecture but the pretraining. Rather than training an ABMIL head from scratch on a small clinical cohort, the Mahmood Lab pretrained the aggregator on PC-108, a challenging 108-way pan-cancer morphological classification task spanning 24,000 whole-slide images from Mass General Brigham. The resulting weights are meant to be transferred and fine-tuned on downstream tasks, mirroring the transfer-learning practice long standard in NLP and computer vision but historically underused for MIL. The checkpoints accompany the study "Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?" (Shao et al., ICML 2025), which systematically evaluated MIL transferability.
Three variants are released, one per patch-feature backbone:
abmil.base.uni_v2.pc108-24k (UNI2 features), abmil.base.conch_v15.pc108-24k
(CONCH v1.5 features), and abmil.base.uni.pc108-24k (UNI features). Distributed
through the Mahmood Lab MIL-Lab library under the FEATHER-24K label, they are
downstream slide classifiers rather than self-supervised foundation models, and
each is paired with the patch encoder whose embeddings it was trained to
aggregate.
create_model('abmil.base.<backbone>.pc108-24k', num_classes=...) call,
with no attached classification head so users set the target class count.Each checkpoint is a base-size ABMIL network operating on pre-extracted patch embeddings; the CONCH v1.5 variant consumes 512x512 pixel patches at 20x magnification. The models were pretrained by supervised optimization on the PC-108 pan-cancer task and are released without a classification head, so downstream users attach and train a linear head for their own label set. The accompanying study assessed 11 MIL architectures across 21 pretraining tasks for morphological and molecular subtype prediction, and reported that pretrained MIL models consistently outperform scratch-trained ones even when pretrained on a different organ than the target. Pan-cancer PC-108 pretraining gave the largest transfer gains, improving average KNN performance by 9.8% and fine-tuning performance by 3.3% over random initialization, with ABMIL among the strongest aggregators.
These checkpoints serve computational pathology researchers building slide-level classifiers on limited labeled data. Because clinical cohorts for a given biomarker or subtype are often small and weakly supervised, initializing an ABMIL head from PC-108 weights and fine-tuning offers a stronger starting point than training from scratch, particularly for cancer subtyping and molecular subtype prediction. The three backbone variants let teams reuse patch features they already extract with UNI, UNI2, or CONCH v1.5, and the models integrate with the Mahmood Lab Patho-Bench harness for standardized evaluation.
These checkpoints operationalize a practical finding: MIL aggregators, like backbones in other domains, benefit from transfer learning, and pan-cancer pretraining can outperform much larger slide foundation models while using far less pretraining data. As sub-million-parameter downstream heads rather than self-supervised encoders, they sit at the boundary of the foundation-model landscape, but they lower the barrier to strong slide-level baselines. Access is restricted: the weights and MIL-Lab code carry a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 research-only license and are gated behind registration, the PC-108 training corpus is private to a single US academic medical center, and no training code or intermediate checkpoints are released. The models have not been validated for clinical diagnostic use and require independent evaluation before any diagnostic application.
Ilse, M., et al. (2018) Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning.
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.04712Shao, D., et al. (2025) Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?. International Conference on Machine Learning.
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.09022Papers that recently cited this model.
Mingkai Gu, Zhuang Qi, Xinyuan Chen, et al.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · Oct 2026
Chen Liu, Jing Huang, Lixin Zhou, et al.
Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · Sep 2026
Bongjun Choi, Jeongwon Park, Hyung-Seok Kang, et al.
Computers & Industrial Engineering · Sep 2026
The most-cited papers that cite this model.
Ming Y. Lu, Drew F. K. Williamson, Tiffany Y. Chen, et al.
Nature Biomedical Engineering · Apr 2020
Zhucheng Shao, Hao Bian, Yang Chen, et al.
Neural Information Processing Systems · Jun 2021
Bin Li, Yin Li, K. Eliceiri
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Nov 2020
J. A. van der Laak, G. Litjens, F. Ciompi
Nature Medicine · May 2021
Antoine Miech, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Lucas Smaira, et al.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Dec 2019
Share of papers citing this model.