bio.rodeo
ModelsOrganizationsLeaderboardAbout
bio.rodeo

The authoritative source for evaluating biological foundation models. No hype, just honest analysis.

AboutFAQSubmit a modelContact
© 2026 Pulsatance. All rights reserved. ~
Built by Pulsatance
Pathology foundation models
Pathology

ABMIL

Mahmood Lab / Brigham and Women's Hospital

Attention-based multiple instance learning slide classifiers from the Mahmood Lab, pretrained on a 108-way pan-cancer task over 24,000 slides for transferable whole-slide pathology analysis.

Released: July 2025

ABMIL (Attention-Based Multiple Instance Learning) is a slide-level aggregation method that pools a whole-slide image's patch features into a single prediction using a learned attention mechanism, originally introduced by Ilse, Tomczak, and Welling at ICML 2018. In computational pathology it has become a standard downstream head: a patch encoder first turns a gigapixel slide into a bag of embeddings, and an ABMIL model weights and combines those embeddings for tasks such as cancer subtyping or biomarker prediction. This entry documents a specific set of pretrained ABMIL checkpoints released by the Mahmood Lab at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital.

What distinguishes these checkpoints is not the architecture but the pretraining. Rather than training an ABMIL head from scratch on a small clinical cohort, the Mahmood Lab pretrained the aggregator on PC-108, a challenging 108-way pan-cancer morphological classification task spanning 24,000 whole-slide images from Mass General Brigham. The resulting weights are meant to be transferred and fine-tuned on downstream tasks, mirroring the transfer-learning practice long standard in NLP and computer vision but historically underused for MIL. The checkpoints accompany the study "Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?" (Shao et al., ICML 2025), which systematically evaluated MIL transferability.

Three variants are released, one per patch-feature backbone: abmil.base.uni_v2.pc108-24k (UNI2 features), abmil.base.conch_v15.pc108-24k (CONCH v1.5 features), and abmil.base.uni.pc108-24k (UNI features). Distributed through the Mahmood Lab MIL-Lab library under the FEATHER-24K label, they are downstream slide classifiers rather than self-supervised foundation models, and each is paired with the patch encoder whose embeddings it was trained to aggregate.

#Key Features

  • Pan-cancer pretraining (PC-108): The aggregators are pretrained on a 108-way morphological classification task over 24,000 Mass General Brigham slides, yielding weights that transfer across organs and tasks instead of starting from random initialization.
  • Three matched backbones: Separate checkpoints target UNI, UNI2, and CONCH v1.5 patch features, so users can pair the aggregator with whichever pathology patch encoder they already run.
  • Attention-based pooling: A gated-attention mechanism assigns interpretable weights to individual patches before pooling, indicating which regions drive a slide-level prediction.
  • Lightweight and fine-tunable: Each model has under one million parameters (roughly 0.79M for the CONCH v1.5 variant and 0.92M for the UNI variant), making fine-tuning feasible on a single consumer-grade GPU.
  • Standardized loading: The MIL-Lab library exposes the checkpoints through a single create_model('abmil.base.<backbone>.pc108-24k', num_classes=...) call, with no attached classification head so users set the target class count.

#Technical Details

Each checkpoint is a base-size ABMIL network operating on pre-extracted patch embeddings; the CONCH v1.5 variant consumes 512x512 pixel patches at 20x magnification. The models were pretrained by supervised optimization on the PC-108 pan-cancer task and are released without a classification head, so downstream users attach and train a linear head for their own label set. The accompanying study assessed 11 MIL architectures across 21 pretraining tasks for morphological and molecular subtype prediction, and reported that pretrained MIL models consistently outperform scratch-trained ones even when pretrained on a different organ than the target. Pan-cancer PC-108 pretraining gave the largest transfer gains, improving average KNN performance by 9.8% and fine-tuning performance by 3.3% over random initialization, with ABMIL among the strongest aggregators.

#Applications

These checkpoints serve computational pathology researchers building slide-level classifiers on limited labeled data. Because clinical cohorts for a given biomarker or subtype are often small and weakly supervised, initializing an ABMIL head from PC-108 weights and fine-tuning offers a stronger starting point than training from scratch, particularly for cancer subtyping and molecular subtype prediction. The three backbone variants let teams reuse patch features they already extract with UNI, UNI2, or CONCH v1.5, and the models integrate with the Mahmood Lab Patho-Bench harness for standardized evaluation.

#Impact

These checkpoints operationalize a practical finding: MIL aggregators, like backbones in other domains, benefit from transfer learning, and pan-cancer pretraining can outperform much larger slide foundation models while using far less pretraining data. As sub-million-parameter downstream heads rather than self-supervised encoders, they sit at the boundary of the foundation-model landscape, but they lower the barrier to strong slide-level baselines. Access is restricted: the weights and MIL-Lab code carry a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 research-only license and are gated behind registration, the PC-108 training corpus is private to a single US academic medical center, and no training code or intermediate checkpoints are released. The models have not been validated for clinical diagnostic use and require independent evaluation before any diagnostic application.

Citations

Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning

Preprint

Ilse, M., et al. (2018) Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning.

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.04712

Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?

Preprint

Shao, D., et al. (2025) Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?. International Conference on Machine Learning.

DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.09022

Recent citations

Papers that recently cited this model.

  • Tissue-aware dual-attention multiple instance learning for colorectal cancer diagnosis from whole slide images

    Mingkai Gu, Zhuang Qi, Xinyuan Chen, et al.

    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · Oct 2026

    0
  • Learning set representations with self-supervised masked transformer

    Chen Liu, Jing Huang, Lixin Zhou, et al.

    Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · Sep 2026

    0
  • Multiple instance learning for SSD failure prediction under customer failure-biased labels

    Bongjun Choi, Jeongwon Park, Hyung-Seok Kang, et al.

    Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering · Sep 2026

    0

Top citations

The most-cited papers that cite this model.

  • Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images

    Ming Y. Lu, Drew F. K. Williamson, Tiffany Y. Chen, et al.

    Nature Biomedical Engineering · Apr 2020

    2.2K
  • TransMIL: Transformer based Correlated Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classication

    Zhucheng Shao, Hao Bian, Yang Chen, et al.

    Neural Information Processing Systems · Jun 2021

    1.3KInfluential
  • Dual-stream Multiple Instance Learning Network for Whole Slide Image Classification with Self-supervised Contrastive Learning

    Bin Li, Yin Li, K. Eliceiri

    Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Nov 2020

    981Influential
  • Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic

    J. A. van der Laak, G. Litjens, F. Ciompi

    Nature Medicine · May 2021

    841
  • End-to-End Learning of Visual Representations From Uncurated Instructional Videos

    Antoine Miech, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Lucas Smaira, et al.

    Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Dec 2019

    798

Citations

Total Citations2.6K
Influential557
References50

GitHub

Stars153
Forks24
Open Issues1
Contributors3
Last Push5mo ago
LanguagePython

HuggingFace

Downloads47
Likes6
Last Modified1y ago
Pipelineimage-feature-extraction

Fields of citing research

  • Computer Science18%
  • Medicine13%
  • Engineering4%
  • Biology2%
  • Mathematics1%
  • Physics0%
  • Environmental Science0%
  • Chemistry0%

Share of papers citing this model.

Openness

bio.rodeo opennessClosed · low usability and reproducibility
26Closed
Usability — can I run it?23
Reproducibility — can I retrain it?16
Model Openness Framework
Unclassified
Restrictive license on core components

Tags

attentionhistologyslide_level_classificationtransfer_learning

Resources

GitHub RepositoryResearch PaperHuggingFace ModelHuggingFace ModelHuggingFace Model