Walk-jump sampler that runs molecular dynamics in a smoothed, noised space of all-atom coordinates to generate peptide conformational ensembles.
No providers recorded yet. Browse all providers
Molecular dynamics has to resolve bond vibrations, so its integration timestep sits at a couple of femtoseconds — while the changes that open a cryptic pocket or release a bound loop unfold over microseconds to milliseconds. That gap is an artifact of high-frequency motions that barely affect the ensemble, not something fundamental. JAMUN attacks the timestep rather than the force field: it adds a single fixed amount of Gaussian noise (σ = 0.4 Å) to every atomic coordinate, runs Langevin dynamics in that smoothed space where barriers are blurred and much larger steps are stable, then uses a learned denoiser to "jump" any noisy configuration back to a physically valid all-atom structure.
That noise–walk–jump construction is walk-jump sampling, the framework Prescient Design applied to antibody sequence generation in Walk-Jump Sampling. JAMUN carries it into continuous 3D space and models every atom explicitly, with the walk and jump steps decoupled so that one Langevin trajectory yields many independent structures. Training the denoiser on MD data at a single noise level, rather than over a schedule, keeps the physical priors of the underlying simulations — which is what lets one checkpoint sample peptides that were never in its training set, including peptides longer than any it saw.
JAMUN was developed by Prescient Design, the machine learning group inside Genentech, with a first author at MIT; it appeared on arXiv in October 2024 and was accepted at NeurIPS 2025. It sits alongside MDGen, BioEmu-1 and AlphaFlow in the move from single-structure prediction toward generated ensembles, and is scoped to peptides of two to six residues, where converged reference MD can be run for comparison.
The denoiser is a geometric graph neural network in the NequIP family, built on e3nn, with
roughly 10.5 million parameters. Edges connect atoms within 10 Å in the noisy coordinates;
features combine bondedness, Bessel-embedded interatomic distances, atomic number, PDB atom
name and residue code. The residue index is deliberately excluded, which the authors found
necessary for generalizing to longer chains. Training ran for three days on two 40 GB NVIDIA
A100 GPUs, with identical hyperparameters and the same σ = 0.4 Å throughout; separate
checkpoints exist per dataset only because the force fields, solvent models and temperatures
differ. Training sets span Timewarp 2AA and 4AA, MDGen 4AA-Explicit, the authors' own capped
2AA and uncapped 5AA OpenMM simulations, and CREMP macrocycles.
On a single A100, JAMUN draws a sample in 2 ms for dipeptides and 8 ms for pentapeptides — 100,000 conformations in 3 to 12.5 minutes against 40 minutes to 258 hours for the corresponding reference MD. Markov state model metastable-state probabilities correlate with reference MD at R² = 0.873 and 0.881 on the two Timewarp sets, and 94.7% of samples pass PoseBusters checks. On unseen pentapeptides the Jensen–Shannon distance over all torsions is 0.197, against 0.411 for Boltz-1 and 0.420 for BioEmu.
The immediate use is cheap conformational ensembles for short peptides: screening for cryptic or transient pockets, characterizing a peptide binder's flexibility, and generating starting structures for downstream physics-based work. The macrocycle results extend this to a therapeutic modality where classical force fields are unreliable and quantum-mechanical conformer searches are expensive. The model takes an initial PDB structure and returns a trajectory, so it drops into existing MD analysis pipelines.
JAMUN's contribution is less a leaderboard position than a demonstration that keeping the physics in the representation buys generalization. Approaches that tokenize backbone torsions or fix a pair representation inherit a fixed system size; modelling all atoms in a mildly noised Cartesian space keeps the sampler system-agnostic, and so extends to longer peptides and macrocycles without retraining. The limits are stated candidly: the demonstrations cover two- to six-residue peptides, the model does not transfer to chains as long as ten residues because its training peptides lack secondary structure, and it occasionally hallucinates a basin. Scaling to proteins would need far more MD data generation, the open problem the authors identify.
Much of this page is generated or calculated automatically. Flag anything that looks off and we will re-run it.