bio.rodeo
ModelsOrganizationsLeaderboardAboutSign in
bio.rodeo

The authoritative source for evaluating biological foundation models. No hype, just honest analysis.

Categories
  • DNA & Gene
  • RNA
  • Protein
  • Small molecule
  • Single-cell
  • Spatial omics
  • Pathology
  • Imaging
  • Metabolomics
  • Biosignals
  • Language model
bio.rodeoModelsOrganizationsLeaderboardAboutFAQSubmit a modelContact
© 2026 Pulsatance. All rights reserved. ~
Built by Pulsatance
Imaging foundation models
Imaging

Cellpose 2.0

HHMI Janelia Research Campus

Human-in-the-loop cell segmentation framework enabling custom model training from as few as 100-200 corrected annotations.

Released: October 2022

Cellpose 2.0 is a cell segmentation framework developed by Marius Pachitariu and Carsen Stringer at HHMI Janelia Research Campus, published in Nature Methods in November 2022. It extends the original Cellpose algorithm with a human-in-the-loop active learning pipeline, a graphical user interface for iterative annotation and retraining, and a curated model zoo of nine specialized pretrained checkpoints.

A persistent barrier to adopting deep learning for microscopy segmentation is the cost of generating labeled training data. Prior methods demanded tens of thousands of annotated regions of interest (ROI) to generalize across cell types — a bottleneck that is impractical for individual laboratories. Cellpose 2.0 addresses this directly: by initializing from pretrained models and applying an active learning cycle, the paper demonstrates that only 100-200 manually corrected ROI are sufficient to produce models that match or exceed tools trained on datasets two to three orders of magnitude larger.

The primary benchmark used the TissueNet dataset, which contains 2,601 training and 1,249 test images across six tissue types and six fluorescence platforms. Fine-tuned Cellpose models at 1,000 training ROI outperformed Mesmer — a specialized model trained on 200,000 ROI per tissue category — on this dataset. The human-in-the-loop pipeline with only 167 ROI matched the performance of offline annotation requiring 663 ROI, confirming that iterative active learning is more label-efficient than batch annotation.

#Key Features

  • Human-in-the-loop active learning: An iterative cycle of segmenting, correcting errors in the GUI, and retraining for 100 epochs takes under one minute on a GPU, enabling rapid convergence to a custom model without large labeled datasets.
  • Minimal annotation requirements: Effective custom models can be trained with 100-200 corrected ROI using the active learning pipeline, or 500-1,000 ROI with offline annotation — both are substantial reductions from the tens of thousands typically required.
  • Model zoo of nine pretrained checkpoints: Includes the original cyto/cyto2 generalist models, TissueNet-trained models (TN1, TN2, TN3), LiveCell-trained models (LC1, LC2, LC3, LC4), and a cross-dataset model (CPx), organized into style clusters to guide initialization choice.
  • GUI-integrated annotation and training: The Cellpose GUI provides lasso and brush tools for correcting cell boundaries and launches retraining without command-line interaction, making the workflow accessible to researchers without deep learning expertise.
  • 3D segmentation support: Inherits plane-by-plane volumetric segmentation from Cellpose v1 without requiring 3D-labeled training data.

#Technical Details

Cellpose 2.0 uses the same U-Net-based architecture as the original Cellpose. The network predicts three output channels: a cell probability map and X/Y spatial gradient flows pointing every pixel toward the nearest cell center. At inference, pixels with high probability are grouped by integrating the flow field to convergence and clustered by convergence point to recover instance boundaries.

A key architectural element is the 256-dimensional style vector, computed by global average pooling over the deepest encoder features. This vector is broadcast and added to feature maps at later convolutional layers, allowing the network to adapt its prediction style to image-level context. Style vectors from the nine pretrained models were analyzed with t-SNE and Leiden clustering to verify that each captures a meaningfully distinct segmentation style. The generalist models were trained for 500 epochs (batch size 8, weight decay 1e-5, learning rate 0.2 with 10-epoch warmup) on TissueNet and LiveCell. Human-in-the-loop retraining cycles use only 100 epochs to keep iteration times short. Fine-tuned models at 1,000 ROI achieve approximately 0.73 average precision (AP at IoU=0.5) on TissueNet, outperforming Mesmer despite using far less training data.

#Applications

Cellpose 2.0 is primarily used to adapt segmentation to imaging conditions not covered by generalist models — unusual cell lines, non-standard fluorophore combinations, proprietary imaging platforms, or morphologies absent from public training data. In pharmaceutical high-content screening, fine-tuning from a TissueNet or LiveCell checkpoint on a small annotated set from the target cell line yields substantially better segmentation than a generalist model. The LiveCell-trained checkpoints (LC1-LC4) provide strong initialization for label-free phase-contrast and brightfield microscopy, where generalist fluorescence models underperform. The released TissueNet human-in-the-loop dataset and annotation efficiency benchmarks also serve as a reference for laboratories evaluating how to structure their annotation workflows.

#Impact

Cellpose 2.0 extended one of the most widely used cell segmentation tools in biological imaging by dramatically reducing the annotation burden for custom cell types. The paper demonstrated that active learning with a suitable pretrained initialization can close the gap with specialized models trained on orders-of-magnitude more data, a finding with broad implications for how biological imaging laboratories approach model fine-tuning. The framework is distributed through the standard Cellpose Python package (pip install cellpose), with model zoo checkpoints downloaded automatically on first use. Notable limitations include a dependency on GPU hardware for practical retraining speeds and evaluation concentrated on TissueNet, meaning annotation requirements for more challenging scenarios such as bacteria, electron microscopy, or 3D volumetric data remain less well characterized.

Citation

Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model

Stringer, C. & Pachitariu, M. (2022) Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. bioRxiv.

DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01663-4

Recent citations

Papers that recently cited this model.

  • Phenotypic patterns in feline heart failure: A natural model for understanding variable disease severity in humans

    T. Spanjersberg, Alma H. Hulsman, G. Grinwis, et al.

    iScience · Aug 2026

    0
  • Planar cell polarity complex internalization is dependent on Celsr1 cis-dimerization

    S.G. Latario, Thomas Saba, Brandon M. Trejo, et al.

    iScience · Aug 2026

    0
  • ImageGrains 2.0: Improved precision and generalization for grain segmentation

    David Mair, Guillaume Witz, Ariel Henrique do Prado, et al.

    1

Top citations

The most-cited papers that cite this model.

  • Cellpose3: one-click image restoration for improved cellular segmentation

    C. Stringer, Marius Pachitariu

    bioRxiv · Feb 2024

    323Influential
  • Segment Anything for Microscopy

    Anwai Archit, Sushmita Nair, Nabeel Khalid, et al.

    bioRxiv · Aug 2023

    255
  • Molecularly defined and spatially resolved cell atlas of the whole mouse brain

    Meng Zhang, Xingjie Pan, Won Jung, et al.

    Nature · Dec 2023

    233
  • Supporting

    Matthias Klückmann

    Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders · 2020

    184
  • Open-ST: High-resolution spatial transcriptomics in 3D

    Marie Schott, D. León-Periñán, E. Splendiani, et al.

    bioRxiv · Dec 2023

    163

Related models

Models with similar goals, methods, or subject matter.

  • Cellpose

    HHMI Janelia Research Campus

    Generalist deep learning algorithm for cell and nucleus instance segmentation using simulated diffusion flows, without per-dataset retraining.

    Imaging
  • Cellpose 3

    HHMI Janelia Research Campus

    Generalist cell segmentation pairing the cyto3 super-generalist model with one-click networks that denoise, deblur, and upsample microscopy images.

    Imaging
  • Cellpose-SAM

    HHMI Janelia Research Campus

    Generalist cell segmentation model pairing SAM's ViT-L encoder with Cellpose flow fields, outperforming average human annotators on its benchmark.

    Imaging
  • CellSeg3D

    Mathis Lab

    Self-supervised 3D cell segmentation for fluorescence microscopy, pairing WNet3D with Swin-UNetR to segment volumes without annotated training data.

    Imaging
  • Cytoland

    Chan Zuckerberg Biohub / Mehta Lab

    Virtual staining models that translate label-free light microscopy into fluorescent-equivalent predictions of nuclei and plasma membranes.

    Imaging

Citations

Total Citations1.1K
Influential178
References61

GitHub

Stars2.3K
Forks641
Open Issues63
Contributors64
Last Push1mo ago
LanguagePython
LicenseBSD-3-Clause

Fields of citing research

  • Medicine29%
  • Biology28%
  • Computer Science14%
  • Engineering9%
  • Materials Science3%
  • Environmental Science3%
  • Chemistry2%
  • Physics2%

Share of papers citing this model.

Openness

bio.rodeo opennessFully open · usable and reproducible
59Partial
Usability — can I run it?70
Reproducibility — can I retrain it?56
Model Openness Framework
Unclassified
Restrictive license on core components

Tags

active_learningcell_biologyfluorescence_microscopyinstance_segmentationsegmentationtransfer_learning

Resources

GitHub RepositoryResearch PaperOfficial WebsiteDocumentationDataset