Diffusion model for protein-protein docking that unifies structure sampling and energy-based decoy ranking, without requiring MSAs and generalizing to unseen targets.
DFMDock is a diffusion-based model for protein-protein docking developed by Lee-Shin Chu, Sudeep Sarma, and Jeffrey Gray at Johns Hopkins University. Predicting how two proteins assemble into a complex requires both generating plausible bound poses and reliably identifying which pose is correct. Most recent diffusion-based docking methods decouple these two problems, sampling structures with one model and ranking candidate decoys with a separate scoring function. DFMDock unifies them in a single framework.
The model jointly learns to sample structures and to rank them by predicting denoising forces alongside a scalar energy value, supervised through physically motivated objectives that combine force matching with contrastive training. Because the energy is learned as part of the same network that generates poses, DFMDock produces an internally consistent ranking signal rather than relying on an external scoring tool. A notable practical property is that it operates without multiple sequence alignments and generalizes to targets not seen during training.
Introduced on bioRxiv in September 2024 and updated in 2025, DFMDock is released with training and inference code and pretrained weights, following a line of generative approaches to macromolecular docking.
DFMDock casts rigid-body docking as a denoising diffusion process over the relative pose of two protein partners. The network is trained to predict the forces that reverse the diffusion corruption and, simultaneously, a scalar energy assigned to each configuration; force matching ties the generative dynamics to the energy landscape, while contrastive training sharpens the energy's ability to rank candidate poses. On Docking Benchmark 5 (DB5), DFMDock reaches a 32.8% Oracle success rate and a 5.3% Top-1 success rate, improving on DiffDock-PP, which reports 16.2% and 4.3% respectively under the same evaluation. The authors further show that the learned energy is a stronger ranking signal than Rosetta energy or confidence scores derived from structure predictors. Code, pretrained weights, and DIPS-based checkpoints are distributed through the Gray Lab GitHub repository under the MIT license; the repository does not include a formal model card.
DFMDock is aimed at structural biologists and computational researchers who need to predict the three-dimensional structure of protein-protein complexes, particularly when deep multiple sequence alignments are unavailable or when candidate poses must be ranked without external energy functions. Because it both samples and scores, it can be used to enumerate plausible binding modes and prioritize them in a single pass, supporting interactome modeling, mechanistic studies of complex formation, and hypothesis generation for interactions lacking experimental structures.
DFMDock illustrates that generative sampling and energy-based ranking need not be separate stages: coupling them through force matching and contrastive supervision yields a learned energy that ranks poses more effectively than established physics-based and confidence-based alternatives. The roughly two-fold improvement in Oracle success rate over DiffDock-PP on DB5 marks meaningful progress for MSA-free diffusion docking. As a preprint benchmarked in silico, its performance on prospective, experimentally validated targets remains to be established, and success rates on DB5 indicate that rigid-body docking of arbitrary complexes remains an open challenge.
Chu, L., et al. (2024) Unified Sampling and Ranking for Protein Docking with DFMDock. bioRxiv.
DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.27.615401Papers that recently cited this model.
Ernest Glukhov, S. Vajda, D. Kozakov
Current Opinion in Structural Biology · May 2026
James P. Roney, Chenxi Ou, Sergey Ovchinnikov
bioRxiv · Mar 2026
Da Xu, Lee-Shin Chu, Jeffrey J. Gray
bioRxiv · Dec 2025
The most-cited papers that cite this model.
Pablo Gainza, R. D. Bunker, S. Townson, et al.
Trends in Biotechnology · May 2025
James P. Roney, Chenxi Ou, Sergey Ovchinnikov
bioRxiv · Mar 2026
Zhenghan Fang, M. D'iaz, Sam Buchanan, et al.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · Jul 2025
Linlong Jiang, Ke Zhang, Kai Zhu, et al.
WIREs Computational Molecular Science · Mar 2025
Sudeep Sarma, Harrison H. Truscott, Da Xu, et al.
bioRxiv · Nov 2025
Share of papers citing this model.