bio.rodeo
ModelsOrganizationsLeaderboardAbout
bio.rodeo

The authoritative source for evaluating biological foundation models. No hype, just honest analysis.

AboutFAQSubmit a modelContact
© 2026 Pulsatance. All rights reserved. ~
Built by Pulsatance
Protein foundation models
Protein

Caliby

Stanford University

Ensemble-conditioned inverse folding: a Potts-model sequence design method that conditions on a structural ensemble to improve designability and self-consistency.

Released: September 2025

Structure-conditioned sequence design—also called inverse folding—asks for an amino-acid sequence that will fold into a given target backbone, and it underpins much of modern de novo protein design. State-of-the-art models such as ProteinMPNN nonetheless struggle with many non-idealized backbones under standard in-silico success criteria. Caliby, from the Protein Design Lab at Stanford University and released as a preprint in 2025, argues that a common training objective is partly to blame: optimizing for native sequence recovery pushes models to reproduce non-structural signals such as phylogenetic relatedness, neutral drift, and dataset sampling biases rather than a clean, generalizable structure-to-sequence mapping.

Caliby is a Potts-model-based sequence design method that conditions on an ensemble of structures rather than a single backbone. It generates a synthetic conformational ensemble from an input backbone using Protpardelle-1c partial diffusion, then samples sequences consistent with the shared structural constraints of the ensemble. Averaging over the ensemble suppresses biases toward any one native sequence while preserving the structural signal common to all members.

The result is a design method that trades raw native sequence recovery for markedly better structural self-consistency, extending the reach of inverse folding to less idealized backbones.

#Key Features

  • Ensemble conditioning: Designs sequences against a synthetic structural ensemble rather than a single static backbone, averaging out non-structural biases.
  • Potts-model formulation: Learns a probabilistic sequence model from which designs are sampled, with dedicated modules for scoring and sidechain packing.
  • Improved self-consistency: Reduces native sequence recovery while substantially improving AlphaFold2 self-consistency, outperforming ProteinMPNN and ChromaDesign on both native and de novo backbones.
  • SolubleCaliby variant: A version trained only on soluble proteins recovers Protpardelle-1c binder designs that SolubleMPNN had deemed undesignable, exposing limitations of existing filtering pipelines.
  • Open weights and tooling: Released under Apache-2.0 with checkpoints on Hugging Face, plus a command-line interface, a Python API, and a Colab notebook.

#Technical Details

Caliby models protein sequences with a Potts (Markov random field) formulation and conditions the learned couplings on an input structural ensemble; sequences are then drawn by sampling from this model, with separate sidechain-packing modules for downstream evaluation. The released checkpoints include the default caliby (trained on all PDB chains with 0.3 Å noise), soluble_caliby (excluding transmembrane proteins), and caliby_distill (a distilled variant that avoids the ensemble-generation step), alongside sidechain packers trained at several noise levels. Weights download automatically on first run. In-silico, ensemble-conditioned design improves AlphaFold2 self-consistency over ProteinMPNN and ChromaDesign despite lower native sequence recovery.

#Applications

Caliby is intended for protein engineers and de novo design teams who need sequences for challenging, non-idealized backbones—cases where recovery-optimized inverse-folding models tend to fail self-consistency filters. Its ensemble-conditioned sampling is particularly useful for binder design and other tasks where backbones deviate from highly regular topologies, and the SolubleCaliby variant can rescue designs that soluble-specific filters would otherwise reject. The Apache-2.0 release, CLI, Python API, and Colab make it straightforward to slot into existing design pipelines.

#Impact

By reframing inverse folding around structural ensembles and away from native sequence recovery, Caliby offers evidence that recovery-centric objectives encode undesirable biases, and it expands the designable space beyond highly idealized backbones. As a successor to ProteinMPNN and ChromaDesign with fully open weights and code, it provides a practical new tool and a conceptual shift for structure-conditioned design. As a preprint awaiting peer review, its advantages are so far demonstrated through in-silico self-consistency benchmarks rather than experimental characterization.

Citation

Ensemble-conditioned protein sequence design with Caliby

Preprint

Shuai, R. W., et al. (2025) Ensemble-conditioned protein sequence design with Caliby. bioRxiv.

DOI: 10.1101/2025.09.30.679633

Recent citations

Papers that recently cited this model.

  • UMA-Inverse: Ligand-Conditioned Protein Inverse Folding with a Distogram-Supervised Dense Pair Encoder

    W. Sobolewski

    Jul 2026

    0
  • Zero-shot design of a de novo metalloenzyme

    Gina El Nesr, S. Dürr, Irimpan I. Mathews, et al.

    bioRxiv · Apr 2026

    0
  • Beyond native sequence recovery: Improved modeling of the sequence-energy landscape of protein structures

    Foster Birnbaum, A. Keating

    bioRxiv · Jan 2026

    1

Top citations

The most-cited papers that cite this model.

  • Beyond native sequence recovery: Improved modeling of the sequence-energy landscape of protein structures

    Foster Birnbaum, A. Keating

    bioRxiv · Jan 2026

    1
  • UMA-Inverse: Ligand-Conditioned Protein Inverse Folding with a Distogram-Supervised Dense Pair Encoder

    W. Sobolewski

    Jul 2026

    0
  • Zero-shot design of a de novo metalloenzyme

    Gina El Nesr, S. Dürr, Irimpan I. Mathews, et al.

    bioRxiv · Apr 2026

    0
  • LeFlur: A Biomolecular Design Model with Latent Structure Tokens

    S. Lisanza, Karina Zadorozhny, Frédéric A. Dreyer, et al.

    0

Citations

Total Citations4
Influential0
References53

GitHub

Stars106
Forks15
Open Issues0
Contributors2
Last Push12d ago
LanguagePython
LicenseApache-2.0

HuggingFace

Downloads0
Likes0
Last Modified12d ago

Fields of citing research

  • Biology100%
  • Computer Science75%
  • Medicine50%
  • Chemistry25%
  • Engineering25%

Share of papers citing this model.

Openness

bio.rodeo opennessOpen weights · open weights, closed recipe
72Open
Usability — can I run it?99
Reproducibility — can I retrain it?44
open weights, closed recipe
Model Openness Framework
Unclassified
Missing required components

Tags

generativeinverse_foldingpotts_modelprotein_design

Resources

GitHub RepositoryResearch PaperHuggingFace Model